A year or so ago, my apartment was broken into, and my bicycle wasstolen. It was a classic Italian racing bike from the early 1980’s, soI didn’t get all that much money from my insurance company.
Recently, I went to a century ride and started riding in a pacelinewith a group of cyclists I didn’t know. As I dropped back from riding onpoint, I looked over, and there was my old bicycle!
I followed the guy back to the finish line, got his auto tag numberand called the cops. They say they are looking into it, but nothing sofar. What would have happened if I had just grabbed the bike, the guy,or both? Would I have gotten in trouble?
You did the smart thing. Self-help recovery of stolen property is oftenlegal, but can be tricky. Legally, a person cannot be guilty of stealinghis own property, and proof of title is usually sufficient to defend againstan accusation of theft. A U.S. Military Court of Appeals overturned therobbery conviction of a soldier who recovered an exercise bicycle fromthe apartment of his former girlfriend. In addition, in most (but not all)states a reasonable, good faith belief that one is the owner ofproperty is an affirmative defense against theft.
However, there are many exceptions and reservations to this generalrule. Because your insurance company gave you a settlement on the stolenbicycle, they, not you, may be the owner of the bicycle. Moreover, becauseyou signed a settlement agreement with the insurance company, a prosecutormay be able to argue that you had reasonable notice that the bicycle nolonger belonged to you, so you lacked even a reasonable, good-faith beliefthat you were recovering your own property.
Also, you must recover only the specific property that was taken fromyou. In a State of Washington case, a landscape worker stole a weed-wackerfrom his boss, a landscape contractor. The owner went to the worker’s homeand took a weed-wacker from his carport. It was the same make and model,but wasn’t the same wacker that was stolen from the contractor,who later had to pay a $10,000 criminal fine for theft. If your bicyclethief bought a new set of wheels and put them on the bike before you appliedself-help recovery, you could be guilty, depending on the state, of eitherstealing the wheels or, because it wasn’t the specific property taken fromyou, of stealing the entire bicycle!
What if the guy you saw at the century was not the thief, but someonewho innocently bought it from the thief? A person who pays a reasonableprice to a seller, and who is unaware that the seller does not own title,is called a bona fide purchaser. While every state allows the genuine owner(that’s you) to recover property from a bona fide purchaser, thegenuine purchaser cannot use self-help recovery—she must go through thelaw. The use of self-help would be illegal.
Finally, the use of force, threat of force, or a retaliatory act torecover nullifies the defense of good-faith self-help in every state thatI was able to find on point law. While one New York judge noted that hisstate permitted a limited right of self-help recovery, he cautioned that:
“The availability of such remedy does not countenance self-help whichinvolves the threat or actual use of force”
In a California case, juvenile A believed that juvenile B had stolenhis bicycle. To get it back, A took B’s bicycle and locked it in his parent’sgarage (with their permission) until his bicycle was returned. B’s parents,knowing only that B’s bicycle had been stolen, called the cops. Both kidsand the garage-owning parents all ended up going before the juvenile court.In the military court case mentioned above (where the soldier recoveredhis exercise bicycle from his former girlfriend’s apartment) one judgeadvocate noted that it was a very good thing that the soldier’s name wasstill on the apartment lease and that he lawfully had a key to the door,because if the soldier hadn’t, the judge would have cleared him of thetheft charge and then had him arrested on his way out of the courtroomfor breaking and entering!
This raises one final point you should consider about self-help recoveryof stolen property: the authorities don’t like it. Self-help recovery ismessy and tends to get people hurt. In at least two states, Arkansas andWashington, self-help recovery is prohibited if it threatens a breach ofthe peace. This is probably true in several more states.I believe you exercised sound judgment. It is likely that the reasonyou haven’t heard back from the police is because the guy you saw at thecentury was a naive buyer, and the police are tracing back his source,who may be a big-time thief or professional dealer of stolen goods (orthe police have more pressing cases than a stolen bicycle). I suggest youcall your insurance carrier and tell them you might have a lead. They wouldlike to get some of their settlement back, and may have a contact at thepolice department or district attorney’s office they will try. Take heart—there’s a fairly good chance you’ll see your bike once more.Good luck,
(research and drafting assistance provided by Bruce Epperson-lawstudent-Nova Southeast University)
Now read the fine print:
Bob Mionske is a former competitive cyclist who represented the U.S. at the 1988 Olympic games (where he finished fourth in the road race), the 1992 Olympics, as well as winning the 1990 national championship road race.
After retiring from racing in 1993, he coached the Saturn Professional Cycling team for one year before heading off to law school. Mionske’s practice is now split between personal-injury work, representing professional athletes as an agent and other legal issues facing endurance athletes (traffic violations, contract, criminal charges, intellectual property, etc).
If you have a cycling-related legal question, please send it to firstname.lastname@example.org. Bob will answer as many of these questions privately as he can. He will also select a few questions each week to answer in this column. General bicycle-accident advice can be found at www.bicyclelaw.com.
The information provided in the “Legally speaking” column is not legal advice. The information provided on this public web site is provided solely for the general interest of the visitors to this web site. The information contained in the column applies to general principles of American jurisprudence and may not reflect current legal developments or statutory changes in the various jurisdictions and therefore should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal advice. Understand that reading the information contained in this column does not mean you have established an attorney-client relationship with attorney Bob Mionske. Readers of this column should not act upon any information contained in the web site without first seeking the advice of legal counsel.
FILED UNDER: Uncategorized