All John Fahey: Page 1
-
Swiss lab will not lose WADA accreditation
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Feb. 12, 2013
World Anti-Doping Agency chief says Tygart allegations of EPO tip-off focus on pre-WADA time period
-

One-on-one with the President
- By Neal Rogers
- Published Feb. 7, 2013
- Updated Feb. 7, 2013 at 7:17 AM EDT
In an exclusive interview, UCI president Pat McQuaid discusses anti-doping efforts, his controversial presidency, Armstrong, and more
-
WADA, UCI in war of words over doping reviews
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Jan. 29, 2013
- Updated Jan. 29, 2013 at 4:34 PM EDT
McQuaid publishes private e-mails after WADA president lashes out over its announcement on Monday of an amnesty partnership
-

WADA chief contests UCI statements on review commission
- By Neal Rogers
- Published Jan. 17, 2013
Worlds Anti-Doping Agency chief pushes back at the UCI, calls review process "useless"
-

WADA, CCN have concerns with UCI review commission
- By Matthew Beaudin
- Published Dec. 13, 2012
WADA chief John Fahey and Change Cycling Now backer Jaimie Fuller express concern over independence of UCI's 'independent commission'
-

WADA draft code: Stiffer penalties, investigative powers
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Nov. 18, 2012
USADA's success in the Armstrong Affair shows that "we can achieve outcomes," said WADA's Fahey. "We can bring things through to a point
-

UCI, WADA set for Armstrong meeting
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Nov. 16, 2012
The UCI and WADA will meet this weekend in Montreal to address the Armstrong Affair
-
WADA 'encouraged' by UCI Armstrong stance
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Oct. 22, 2012
World Anti-Doping Agency boss says the UCI's ban of Armstrong is a step in the right direction
-
WADA chief says he will consider amnesty program
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Oct. 19, 2012
John Fahey tells Australian broadcaster that the WADA board will discuss amnesty for cycling and other sports
-

WADA: Armstrong's failure to fight seen as confession
- By VeloNews.com
- Published Aug. 24, 2012
Armstrong "can say what he likes," says John Fahey, but his arguments should have been examined in arbitration



